Do batteries add viability to electrolysers within the current market?

Last month, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) announced that there will be a gas shortfall in the east coast market in 2023, not a surprise considering the international gas crisis and high gas prices in Australia. Such events have increased attention towards expanding gas supply or reducing the gas demand in Australia and worldwide.

One well-known alternative for reducing natural gas demand is hydrogen. In this regard, polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolysers are expected to become an important part of hydrogen production in Australia. PEM electrolysers consume electricity to produce hydrogen.

Although PEM electrolysers are on the top of the list regarding hydrogen production, they are subject to an operational limitation: the price of electricity they consume. This means the employment of PEM electrolysers can quickly become non-viable if the electricity prices are high. To reduce this risk and increase “green” credentials, PEM electrolysers can be coupled with renewable energy sources and/or a battery energy storage system (BESS). However, adding a renewable generator or a BESS to a PEM electrolyser business case increases the project’s capital expenditure.

In this Chart of the week, we investigate if a BESS can add viability to a PEM electrolyser by levelling its exposure to high electricity prices during the day.

We have conducted a simulation where an electrolyser with 10MW of electricity consumption is coupled with a BESS, both connected to the grid. The analysis uses electrolyser costs similar to AEMO’s 2020 ISP FY22 capital cost of $3500/kW and an estimated project lifetime of 20 years. The operation cost includes the maintenance cost, and the cost of electricity with the electrolyser assumed to run at an 80% capacity factor (which has not been finely optimised on pricing vs capex). Electrolyser’s efficiency is 73% (54 kWh/kg H2), and the WACC has been considered at 10%.

The levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) has been given in the chart for different BESS capacities (MW) and BESS capital costs ($/KW). The cost of BESS has been considered in a range from $1521/kW (including registration fees) to $400/kW to reflect the future changes in BESS capital costs.

As is seen in the chart, with the current capital cost of BESS and the electricity prices in the NEM, a BESS cannot add viability to the PEM electrolyser (see green bars). The reason is that while a BESS can reduce the electrolyser’s exposure to high prices, the BESS capital expenditure results in higher values of LCOH. Note that this only shows the LCOH for a BESS coupled with a PEM electrolyser (a large load to be supplied by the grid and possibly the BESS) and DOES NOT mean that a standalone BESS is an infeasible project on its own.

Assuming the cost of BESS is reduced to 600-400 $/kW (forecasted in 2040-2050), a BESS coupled with a PEM electrolyser is more viable than a standalone PEM electrolyser. This is shown with the dark navy bars in the chart.

To conclude, a BESS can add viability to a PEM electrolyser and can reduce the LCOH, but this is only true if the capital cost of BESS considerably reduces to $900/kW for large-scale BESS (almost 100MW) and to 600-400 $/kW for smaller sizes. The size of the BESS is of importance here as the bigger the BESS, the less exposure to high prices by the electrolyser (let’s not forget that the electricity price is an important element in determining the LCOH).

It should also be noted that the cost of electrolyser is also projected to reduce to almost $1000/kW post-2030. However, this does not reduce the LCOH as we may expect, but the $2/kg hydrogen is not a dream if the electricity prices cooperate too.

In this study, we benefited from our benchmark price curves which provide a high-resolution forecast of electricity prices in the NEM to 2050. For more information on our benchmark price curves, please contact us at

To keep reading, please log in to your account or sign up for free

Alternatively, please sign up to receive free market insight online and direct to your inbox

Related thinking

Commercial and market outlook

VNI West selected path; an incentive for delaying coal retirements?

On 29 May 2023, AEMO published a conclusions report on the VNI West Project. According to the report, option 5A (a variant of  AEMO’s preferred option in a previous consultation paper) is preferred for VNI West. In option 5A, the transmission line crosses the Murray River north of Kerang (Wamba...

Commercial and market outlook

Spot the spread: Are current battery revenues enough to encourage further investment?

In AEMO’s ‘Step Change’ scenario, it was estimated that storage capacity in the NEM would need to increase by a factor of 30 between 2022 and 2050 to support a grid transformation that limits temperature rises below 2 degrees. This represents about 13GW of new storage capacity by 2030 and...

Power and gas networks

Trouble Ahead? – What’s Next For TNUoS Charges?

Some industry participants will be well versed in the Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) charging regime, while others may not have had to engage with it before. Regardless of previous involvement, these charges are becoming increasingly important to understand for reasons we will discuss shortly.  In this week’s ‘Chart...

Commercial and market outlook

Feast or famine? FCAS costs in South Australia

Frequency Control Ancillary Service (FCAS) prices are highly volatile, at times resulting in short periods of extremely high FCAS cost. Three such events in recent history are the South Australian (SA) islanding events in November 2019, February 2020, and November 2022. During these events, FCAS costs in SA totalled $16...

Low carbon generation

NSW’s transition to a new era: What will replace Eraring?

After 52 years of operation, the NSW Liddell power station officially shut down last 28 April. With Liddell’s closure, NSW’s transition to a green energy future is in full swing. First announced in 2015, NSW had seven years to ensure there is enough replacement capacity once Liddell is retired. Since...

Commercial and market outlook

It’s the Liddell things that matter

Australia’s oldest coal-fired power plant Liddell retired completely in the last week of April 2023 after 52 years. This giant of AGL, which had a total registered capacity of 2,000 MW, operationally acted as a 1600MW station and 1200MW after the closure of its third unit. Australia’s transition to clean...

Energy storage and flexibility

A look at AEMO pre-dispatch forecasts over the last year

The Energy Security Board (ESB), under the direction of the National Cabinet, is currently working on a number of changes that will impact how generators connect to and operate within the National Electricity Market (NEM). The Congestion Relief Market (CRM) model is one such change to how the NEM currently...


Furthering clarity and capacity: The UK increase low-carbon hydrogen commitments

In this third instalment of our Low-carbon Hydrogen Index, which tracks the progress of 14 nations in their commitment to develop a low-carbon hydrogen economy, we discuss the top countries in the index. See how the rankings have changed since we last released our Low-carbon Hydrogen Index in March 2022.