How does thermal storage stack up compared to batteries?

Along with the retirement of coal/gas power plants in the NEM, long-duration energy storage systems (LDESS), often exceeding 8 hours of storage, are becoming more crucial in transitioning to a more sustainable and renewable energy future. LDESS technologies, such as battery storage systems (BESS), thermal energy storage systems (TESS), compressed air and pumped hydro storage, would offer grid operators a flexible, consistent power supply during peak demand or low renewable generation, resulting in less reliance on fossil fuel-based power plants.

In recent years, TESS has attracted lots of attention as a promising type of storage. TESS is a technology that allows for the capture and retention of heat energy for later use. Thermal energy can be stored through phase-change materials that absorb and release heat during their transition between solid and liquid states.

In this Chart of the week, we investigate the prospects of long-duration TESS and BESS in NSW and QLD by presenting some analysis and key insights derived from models of BESS and TESS, both developed by Cornwall-Insight Australia.

Figure 1a shows forecasted revenue for 100MW/8hrs LDESSs in NSW and QLD from the energy market arbitrage and 8 FCAS markets. Neglecting the policies of governments in these two states, the results show that QLD is a better option for investors than NSW. Having a much faster response time, BESS can earn around 8.5% and 7.5% of revenue from NSW and QLD FCAS markets, while this revenue stream is less than 2% for TESS in both states, which uses a turbine to export stored energy to the grid.

This highlights the value of a higher ‘round-trip efficiency’ to capture arbitrage revenue compared to ‘response time’ to harvest revenue from FCAS markets with limited sizes. This has been the major advantage of BESS over TESS (e.g. charged by a 100MW resistive heater).

Based on the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), capital costs of a 100MW/8hr BESS and TESS are $491M and $407M, respectively. Noteworthy that these costs may vary based on the technology of assets, EPC and construction expenditures. Comparing the gross profit (revenue minus cost) of these two technologies for the QLD scenario, it can be seen that BESS performs better with $791M than TESS, which returns a $344M profit. A similar ranking is obtained for the NSW scenario as well.

From an operating point of view, Figure 1b shows how TESS captures a higher $/MWh of energy exported to the grid than BESS. In fact, the low round-trip efficiency of TESS (i.e., 42% for TESS considering efficiencies of a resistive heater, turbine efficiency, and thermal loss; 82% for BESS considering inverter efficiencies) would force TESS to only operate during peak price periods as its total exported MWh is lower than BESS. However, the value of this parameter is less divergent for these two assets in the second half of the operating horizon. This would illustrate the significance of capacity degradation as a distinct advantage of TESS over BESS. This is clearly depicted in Figure 2a, where BESS degradation diminishes BESS arbitrage opportunity when the energy price spread increases yearly, and FCAS revenues almost fade.

Having said that, the matter of availability and maturity of TESS is still uncertain, at least for the next couple of years, compared with BESS technology which seems the most promising current investment option. Therefore, the question would arise, “How is the performance of a long-duration BESS compared with a 2hr- BESS?”. From the revenue point of view, based on Figure 2b, an approximate 285% increase in total revenue (for NSW and QLD cases) is obtained when upgrading BESS MWh to 8hr, which needs to be optimised against 350% investment capital increase (NREL, reference year 2025).     

In this Chart of the week, we benefited from our consulting and Benchmark power curve modelling services, which provide a comprehensive advisory platform for long-term revenue forecast of renewable energy and storage systems in NEM. Please contact us at enquiries@cornwall-insight.com.au for more information. 

To keep reading, please log in to your account

Related thinking

Energy storage and flexibility

R1 and L1 revving up the BESS revenues

In our ‘The VFF… Very Fast and Financially rewarding market so far’ Chart of the week, the two new contingency markets, the Very Fast raise contingency FCAS market and the Very Fast lower contingency FCAS, were analysed and demonstrated the high participation of big batteries along with VPPs and DERs....

Low carbon generation

An investigation into REZ capacity factors during Victoria’s dark doldrums

As the grid transitions to much higher levels of renewable penetration, the range of generation outcomes on any given day increases. The worst of these ranges are known as dark doldrums when there is a combination of poor conditions for wind and solar generation, usually a windless day in winter....

Commercial and market outlook

The VFF… Very Fast and Financially rewarding market so far

On 9 October 2023, 1pm (market time), we saw the start of two new contingency FCAS markets. The Very fast raise contingency FCAS market, and the Very fast lower contingency FCAS. Upon commencement of the VF FCAS market, a commissioning period of two weeks with an initial max requirement of...

Commercial and market outlook

Is the sun setting on utility solar?

The Federal Government has legislated emissions reductions of 43% below 2005 levels by 2030. Sourcing electricity from renewable technologies is fundamental to meeting this, with a much-publicised target of 82% renewables in the grid by 2030 – up from a current value of 38% over the last year. Fortunately, the...

Commercial and market outlook

The Very Fast FCAS market is about to commence – a look at a possible time-of-day profile for R1

On 9 October 2023, 1pm (market time), the dispatch of the new Very Fast (VF) FCAS market in the NEM will commence and will add two new markets for contingency FCAS, Raise 1 (R1) and Lower 1 (L1). AEMO has released a final industry go-live plan to keep track of...

Low carbon generation

“Ooh, a storm is threatening, My very [interconnection] today”: Can states utilise interconnection to share wind resources?

Penetration of renewables continues to dominate the energy news, as we saw renewables as a proportion of total demand reach new heights this week to a new record of ~70% penetration. In light of this continuing march toward a renewable-dominated grid (building on some analysis we did in Chart of...

Energy storage and flexibility

How long is the ‘Golden time of day’ for batteries?

A key part of the business case for grid-scale standalone batteries is the arbitrage opportunity between low daytime wholesale prices (when renewable energy generation from solar is plentiful) and high evening prices (when the sun goes down and household demand ramps up quickly). The share of battery revenue coming from...

Low carbon generation

MLF changes in NSW in the past decade

MLF, short for Marginal Loss Factor, represents the portion of electricity losses that occur along the transmission network between a connection point and the Regional Reference Node (RRN). Within the NEM, the MLF serves as a metric to quantify these losses along the network, playing a pivotal role in determining...