Hydrogen hype: How cheap the hydrogen from electrolysis can be?

Hydrogen is considered a potential replacement for fossil fuels for energy generation, transport etc. Currently, 96% of hydrogen production originates from fossil fuels through steam reforming and coal gasifications. Only a small fraction (~4%) is produced via electrolysis. The high Capex of the electrolyser is usually referred to as the main barrier, which will result in a high Levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH).

In this Chart of the week, we investigate the optimal performance of an electrolyser in SA, where we consider its participation in the FCAS markets to find the impact of FCAS revenues on the cost of hydrogen production for power generation applications.

Figure 1a shows a 10MW electrolyser connected to a hydrogen tank with a capacity of 5 tons and a 10 MW fuel cell. It is assumed that both fuel cell and electrolyser use PEM technology, which has a quicker response time than alkaline technology and makes them suitable for the provision of FCAS services.

Figure 1b shows the annual cost of hydrogen broken down based on Capex, Opex, and Variable O&M (VOM) components along with the capacity factor (rhs) from 2023 to 2049. The energy and FCAS prices are obtained from our Benchmark Power Curve (BPC) and FCAS price forecast for this simulation.

Before 2030, the contribution of VOM to total hydrogen cost is relatively low. For the first three years, it is negative, meaning that the revenues of the electrolyser are higher than its energy consumption costs. This is due to low energy prices, a large number of negative priced intervals, and relatively higher FCAS prices compared to the years after 2030. These factors incentivised the electrolyser to operate more often over those years and achieve approximately 40% capacity factor (dashed line).

The projected increase in average energy price from 2030, driven by coal retirements, drives the capacity factor lower as the marginal run cost for the electrolyser increases. Overall, the electrolyser capacity factor is 33%, which is mainly driven by the market price dynamics and low round trip efficiency (RTE) of this hydrogen plant which is:

This shows that to earn profit by producing hydrogen, the energy price at discharge time should be approximately 3 times higher than the charging price. Noting that since the Capex is not part of the optimisation model, it does not impact the system’s optimal dispatch in this analysis.

On average, the annual hydrogen production is 530 tons at the cost of $3.7/kg over the simulation period, and the Capex contributed 50% of that. Figure 1b shows that hydrogen cost reaches its max in 2037, at approximately $5/kg, which is due to high energy prices, which sequentially causes a reduction in both the capacity factor, to ~25%, and the amount of hydrogen produced. However, after 2038, the cost of hydrogen and the capacity factor are stable at around $4/kg and 30%, respectively.

The results also show that the majority of hydrogen production occurs during the day when there is a significant proportion of solar generation, which commonly reduces the energy prices. In addition, the use of the stored hydrogen by the fuel cell occurs over the evening peak, which typically has the highest prices. Both assets also actively participate in the FCAS markets and are enabled 40-60% of the time in the regulation markets.

All in all, this analysis shows that with current technologies, even if we assume the best scenario for system operation (e.g 100% availability, FCAS provision at full capacity, etc.), the optimal capacity factor of the electrolyser for generating power purposes does not exceed 45%, which is mainly driven by low round trip efficiency. This low capacity factor magnifies the impact of Capex and Opex on hydrogen cost and leads to $3.7/kg. This is 50% higher than the LCOH of conventional methods such as steam methane reforming, which has an average cost of $2.5/kg. Therefore, in addition to the need for reducing the Capex, the improvement of efficiency is crucial for increasing the capacity factor and ultimately lowering the cost of hydrogen production through electrolysis for power generation applications.

Our in-house hydrogen model and modelling consultants can help shed some light on how prices, revenues, and capacity are likely to evolve going forward. For more information, don’t hesitate to contact us at enquiries@cornwall-insight.com.au.

To keep reading, please log in to your account or sign up for free

Alternatively, please sign up to receive free market insight online and direct to your inbox

Related thinking

Commercial and market outlook

EV uptake set to transform the grid in the Australia – but how much?

Electric vehicles (EVs) are slowly becoming more popular in Australia, with new car sales increased during the last two years. Although Australia is behind in EV deployment compared to other countries, Federal and state governments have taken serious steps to accelerate EV uptake. Therefore, EVs could play a significant role...

Energy storage and flexibility

Unlocking REMA: emerging market views

Recent market events have continued to highlight the challenges of the energy trilemma, specifically the need to decarbonise the energy system while ensuring energy security and affordability. The government announced in April 2022 it would be undertaking a Review of Electricity Market Arrangements (REMA) to address these issues, and in...

Power and gas networks

CMP395 BSUoS cap

On 21 September, the Final Modification Report for CMP395 was published by National Grid ESO (NG ESO). CMP395 seeks to cap the half-hourly Balancing Services Use of System charge (BSUoS) at £15/MWh over the winter period (1 October 2022 – 31 March 2023), with the deferred costs recouped in the...

Commercial and market outlook

Moving with the times: How trading strategies in the NEM changed in a year

Inherent in an electricity market like the NEM is its ever-changing landscape. Contributors to these changes may be government-driven policies, evolving market dynamics caused by external factors like a global pandemic, a worldwide rise in fuel prices, and even changes in the market structure itself. As cliché as it may...

Energy storage and flexibility

It’s a fix! BEIS floors competitive energy market

Last week saw the government announce the Energy Price Guarantee (EPG) which will see the typical dual fuel household’s unit rates capped at 34p/kWh for electricity and 10.3p/kWh for gas. Customers on fixed tariffs will get support to bring their tariffs down to the same level, up to 17p/kWh of...

Energy storage and flexibility

Now we’re peaking with gas: how much evening NEM demand could be replaced with batteries?

The events leading up to the recent market suspension in June have highlighted the role that peaking gas-fired generation plays in satisfying demand and setting prices across the NEM in the morning and evening peak periods. The team recently explored some of the drivers and effects of these events in...

Commercial and market outlook

Off the charts: ESOO flags earlier reliability shortfalls but no need to panic yet

In the space of a year, the prospect of reliability shortfalls in the NEM has increased significantly. This is the stark finding of AEMO’s latest Electricity Statement of Opportunities (ESOO) report. In our Chart of the week, we illustrate how reliability forecasts have deteriorated in just a year, and we...

E-mobility and low carbon

Winds of change: World EV Day

The energy crisis is hitting vehicle running costs for both electric vehicles (EVs) and internal combustion engine (ICE) cars. In this week's 'Chart of the Week', we focus on World EV Day by taking a look at one of the areas we have been tracking – public charging – and...