Hydrogen hype: How cheap the hydrogen from electrolysis can be?

Hydrogen is considered a potential replacement for fossil fuels for energy generation, transport etc. Currently, 96% of hydrogen production originates from fossil fuels through steam reforming and coal gasifications. Only a small fraction (~4%) is produced via electrolysis. The high Capex of the electrolyser is usually referred to as the main barrier, which will result in a high Levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH).

In this Chart of the week, we investigate the optimal performance of an electrolyser in SA, where we consider its participation in the FCAS markets to find the impact of FCAS revenues on the cost of hydrogen production for power generation applications.

Figure 1a shows a 10MW electrolyser connected to a hydrogen tank with a capacity of 5 tons and a 10 MW fuel cell. It is assumed that both fuel cell and electrolyser use PEM technology, which has a quicker response time than alkaline technology and makes them suitable for the provision of FCAS services.

Figure 1b shows the annual cost of hydrogen broken down based on Capex, Opex, and Variable O&M (VOM) components along with the capacity factor (rhs) from 2023 to 2049. The energy and FCAS prices are obtained from our Benchmark Power Curve (BPC) and FCAS price forecast for this simulation.

Before 2030, the contribution of VOM to total hydrogen cost is relatively low. For the first three years, it is negative, meaning that the revenues of the electrolyser are higher than its energy consumption costs. This is due to low energy prices, a large number of negative priced intervals, and relatively higher FCAS prices compared to the years after 2030. These factors incentivised the electrolyser to operate more often over those years and achieve approximately 40% capacity factor (dashed line).

The projected increase in average energy price from 2030, driven by coal retirements, drives the capacity factor lower as the marginal run cost for the electrolyser increases. Overall, the electrolyser capacity factor is 33%, which is mainly driven by the market price dynamics and low round trip efficiency (RTE) of this hydrogen plant which is:

This shows that to earn profit by producing hydrogen, the energy price at discharge time should be approximately 3 times higher than the charging price. Noting that since the Capex is not part of the optimisation model, it does not impact the system’s optimal dispatch in this analysis.

On average, the annual hydrogen production is 530 tons at the cost of $3.7/kg over the simulation period, and the Capex contributed 50% of that. Figure 1b shows that hydrogen cost reaches its max in 2037, at approximately $5/kg, which is due to high energy prices, which sequentially causes a reduction in both the capacity factor, to ~25%, and the amount of hydrogen produced. However, after 2038, the cost of hydrogen and the capacity factor are stable at around $4/kg and 30%, respectively.

The results also show that the majority of hydrogen production occurs during the day when there is a significant proportion of solar generation, which commonly reduces the energy prices. In addition, the use of the stored hydrogen by the fuel cell occurs over the evening peak, which typically has the highest prices. Both assets also actively participate in the FCAS markets and are enabled 40-60% of the time in the regulation markets.

All in all, this analysis shows that with current technologies, even if we assume the best scenario for system operation (e.g 100% availability, FCAS provision at full capacity, etc.), the optimal capacity factor of the electrolyser for generating power purposes does not exceed 45%, which is mainly driven by low round trip efficiency. This low capacity factor magnifies the impact of Capex and Opex on hydrogen cost and leads to $3.7/kg. This is 50% higher than the LCOH of conventional methods such as steam methane reforming, which has an average cost of $2.5/kg. Therefore, in addition to the need for reducing the Capex, the improvement of efficiency is crucial for increasing the capacity factor and ultimately lowering the cost of hydrogen production through electrolysis for power generation applications.

Our in-house hydrogen model and modelling consultants can help shed some light on how prices, revenues, and capacity are likely to evolve going forward. For more information, don’t hesitate to contact us at enquiries@cornwall-insight.com.au.

To keep reading, please log in to your account or sign up for free

Alternatively, please sign up to receive free market insight online and direct to your inbox

Related thinking

Commercial and market outlook

How does thermal storage stack up compared to batteries?

Along with the retirement of coal/gas power plants in the NEM, long-duration energy storage systems (LDESS), often exceeding 8 hours of storage, are becoming more crucial in transitioning to a more sustainable and renewable energy future. LDESS technologies, such as battery storage systems (BESS), thermal energy storage systems (TESS), compressed...

Commercial and market outlook

VNI West selected path; an incentive for delaying coal retirements?

On 29 May 2023, AEMO published a conclusions report on the VNI West Project. According to the report, option 5A (a variant of  AEMO’s preferred option in a previous consultation paper) is preferred for VNI West. In option 5A, the transmission line crosses the Murray River north of Kerang (Wamba...

Commercial and market outlook

Spot the spread: Are current battery revenues enough to encourage further investment?

In AEMO’s ‘Step Change’ scenario, it was estimated that storage capacity in the NEM would need to increase by a factor of 30 between 2022 and 2050 to support a grid transformation that limits temperature rises below 2 degrees. This represents about 13GW of new storage capacity by 2030 and...

Power and gas networks

Trouble Ahead? – What’s Next For TNUoS Charges?

Some industry participants will be well versed in the Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) charging regime, while others may not have had to engage with it before. Regardless of previous involvement, these charges are becoming increasingly important to understand for reasons we will discuss shortly.  In this week’s ‘Chart...

Commercial and market outlook

Feast or famine? FCAS costs in South Australia

Frequency Control Ancillary Service (FCAS) prices are highly volatile, at times resulting in short periods of extremely high FCAS cost. Three such events in recent history are the South Australian (SA) islanding events in November 2019, February 2020, and November 2022. During these events, FCAS costs in SA totalled $16...

Low carbon generation

NSW’s transition to a new era: What will replace Eraring?

After 52 years of operation, the NSW Liddell power station officially shut down last 28 April. With Liddell’s closure, NSW’s transition to a green energy future is in full swing. First announced in 2015, NSW had seven years to ensure there is enough replacement capacity once Liddell is retired. Since...

Commercial and market outlook

It’s the Liddell things that matter

Australia’s oldest coal-fired power plant Liddell retired completely in the last week of April 2023 after 52 years. This giant of AGL, which had a total registered capacity of 2,000 MW, operationally acted as a 1600MW station and 1200MW after the closure of its third unit. Australia’s transition to clean...

Energy storage and flexibility

A look at AEMO pre-dispatch forecasts over the last year

The Energy Security Board (ESB), under the direction of the National Cabinet, is currently working on a number of changes that will impact how generators connect to and operate within the National Electricity Market (NEM). The Congestion Relief Market (CRM) model is one such change to how the NEM currently...