Moving with the times: How trading strategies in the NEM changed in a year

Inherent in an electricity market like the NEM is its ever-changing landscape. Contributors to these changes may be government-driven policies, evolving market dynamics caused by external factors like a global pandemic, a worldwide rise in fuel prices, and even changes in the market structure itself. As cliché as it may be, the only constant in life is change, and adaptability plays an important role, especially for the participants in the electricity market.

Market participants’ trading strategies in the spot market play a key role in shaping the landscape of an electricity market. Though trading strategies evolve, their primary objectives remain – revenue sufficiency. Day-ahead to week-ahead price forecasts are very important sources of information for revenue maximisation, especially for energy-constrained generators like battery and hydroelectric power plants. Real-time monitoring is also as important.

In this Chart of the week, we analyse the changes in bid strategies of scheduled generators by comparing the difference in offered volumes at certain price ranges between 2022 and 2021 across different months. Positive values show that offers in 2022 are higher than in 2021, while negatives show the opposite. We’ll explore how NEM participants have adapted their trading strategies to changes brought about by an increase in fuel prices and market settlement structure. The top chart of Figure 1 is an analysis of fossil fuel plants, while the one at the bottom is for non-fossil fuel plants (solar, wind, batteries, and hydro).

For fossil fuel plants, a comparison of 2022 to 2021 offer quantities allocation shows the movement of significant volumes (averaging 2500 MW) from the $30/MWh to $50/MWh range. While for the first quarter of 2022, we can see significant volumes (averaging 1500 MW) moved from $50/MWh to $100/MWh, that was not the case as the months progressed, wherein offer quantities are allocated to 100 $/MWh to 1,000 $MWh. This can be attributed to the rise in fossil fuel prices compared to the same time last year. Spot prices for coal haven’t gone back since they started going up from around US$85-86/MT in January-February 2021 to ~ US$440/MT this month. These spot prices however don’t completely flow through electricity prices due to factors like the presence of long-term contracts. The same can be said for domestic gas prices, which were not spared from the effects of the ongoing war in Ukraine. The increase in the price of these fossil fuels, coal and gas, has driven changes in the trading strategy of the generator participants using those fuel types.

We can see allocation increase in the highest price range bucket $10,000/MWh to $16,000/MWh in the month of June, which also happens to be the month the market was suspended. In August, most of the capacities moved away to the lower price ranges, going from $100/MWh to $1,000/MWh and $10,000/MWh to $16,000/MWh. Fewer changes in offered volumes from 2021 to 2022 are also seen for August compared to June and July.

The implementation of 5-minute settlement on 1 October 2021 also brought about changes in bidding strategy for non-fossil fuel plants, as evident on the bottom chart of Figure 1, where there is a significant movement of offered quantities away from -1,000 $/MWh to -100 $/MWh.  Moving these quantities to near 0 $/MWh was the chosen step as the growth in VRE capacity in the market means that they are increasingly having influence over the price at times compared to historically, where they would be price-takers. Therefore, we see VRE rebidding from -$1,000 to a price point closer to their willingness to generate – a trend we anticipate continuing.

The price for which fossil generators bids is dependent on their fuel costs. If fuel prices do reduce towards historical trends, then we could see reduced offers (and, by extension, prices) from fossil generators. However, the impact of an increase in fuel prices can also be tempered with the increased deployment of VRE, which offsets the need to utilise fossil generation in the first place.

To keep reading, please log in to your account or sign up for free

Alternatively, please sign up to receive free market insight online and direct to your inbox

Related thinking

Commercial and market outlook

VNI West selected path; an incentive for delaying coal retirements?

On 29 May 2023, AEMO published a conclusions report on the VNI West Project. According to the report, option 5A (a variant of  AEMO’s preferred option in a previous consultation paper) is preferred for VNI West. In option 5A, the transmission line crosses the Murray River north of Kerang (Wamba...

Commercial and market outlook

Spot the spread: Are current battery revenues enough to encourage further investment?

In AEMO’s ‘Step Change’ scenario, it was estimated that storage capacity in the NEM would need to increase by a factor of 30 between 2022 and 2050 to support a grid transformation that limits temperature rises below 2 degrees. This represents about 13GW of new storage capacity by 2030 and...

Power and gas networks

Trouble Ahead? – What’s Next For TNUoS Charges?

Some industry participants will be well versed in the Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) charging regime, while others may not have had to engage with it before. Regardless of previous involvement, these charges are becoming increasingly important to understand for reasons we will discuss shortly.  In this week’s ‘Chart...

Commercial and market outlook

Feast or famine? FCAS costs in South Australia

Frequency Control Ancillary Service (FCAS) prices are highly volatile, at times resulting in short periods of extremely high FCAS cost. Three such events in recent history are the South Australian (SA) islanding events in November 2019, February 2020, and November 2022. During these events, FCAS costs in SA totalled $16...

Low carbon generation

NSW’s transition to a new era: What will replace Eraring?

After 52 years of operation, the NSW Liddell power station officially shut down last 28 April. With Liddell’s closure, NSW’s transition to a green energy future is in full swing. First announced in 2015, NSW had seven years to ensure there is enough replacement capacity once Liddell is retired. Since...

Commercial and market outlook

It’s the Liddell things that matter

Australia’s oldest coal-fired power plant Liddell retired completely in the last week of April 2023 after 52 years. This giant of AGL, which had a total registered capacity of 2,000 MW, operationally acted as a 1600MW station and 1200MW after the closure of its third unit. Australia’s transition to clean...

Energy storage and flexibility

A look at AEMO pre-dispatch forecasts over the last year

The Energy Security Board (ESB), under the direction of the National Cabinet, is currently working on a number of changes that will impact how generators connect to and operate within the National Electricity Market (NEM). The Congestion Relief Market (CRM) model is one such change to how the NEM currently...

Commercial and market outlook

Iceman Liddell calls it a career

Recently in the news, there has been some concern that the closure of the Liddell power station in NSW will be a repeat of what we witnessed in 2017 with the closure of Hazelwood. Hazelwood’s closure led to higher prices, particularly over summer peak demand periods1. This is a poor...