Patriots ‘Dynasty’ off to a rough start, as New England suffers loss to the MLFs…

For many, the first of April is marked in calendars as a day for jokes and silly nuisances. For the few, specifically the energy industry, we have it pencilled in for the release of the upcoming year’s Marginal Loss Factors (MLFs). Over the last half-decade, movements in MLFs have received significant attention in the NEM, particularly those of VRE. Many renewable projects in more distant areas have experienced material MLF reductions as more supply connects nearby and, in layperson’s terms, the lines become full. The most significant example of this was the MLF for Broken Hill Solar Farm which saw a whopping 50 pp (percentage point) drop in two years (from 1.2456 in 17/18 to 0.7566 in 19/20). However, no project has seen anything close to this since revenue swings of this magnitude could turn a profitable project into a loss.

In this Chart of the week, we look at the changes in the Final 22/23 MLF (x-axis) with that indicated in the Final 23/24 MLF version (y-axis). Positive pp points are growth in MLF, with negative changes being losses. In the Chart below, dots to the top right are MLFs that have had back-to-back increases, and dots to the bottom left are those with back-to-back negatives. The mean lines represent the average changes seen across the two years on their respective axis.

The Chart shows that the southern states have remained relatively stable in flow dynamics despite some significant wind installs in the state. The small discrepancies have all fallen closer to NSW based on interconnector flows.

There has been a different story in the northern states, as MLFs are prone to fluctuation. QLD saw last year’s decreases largely reversed where Q2 2022’s unexpected coal outages caused flow dynamics in the north of the state to change completely. Now that they have normalised, we have seen increased flow from QLD to NSW, evident in the major changes in northern NSW (all of which sit on the left-hand side of the graph).

This was compounded with the new generation adding further competition (both recently connected Metz solar farm and New England solar farm, Australia’s future biggest active solar farm, both receiving huge 0.035pp drops). Moree SF has the largest swing in two years on project levels, seeing a 0.10 drop. The Hydro nearby, Silverton, Sapphire, and White Rock sites have seen at least 3pp decreases. The changes to the north of NSW may have come down to a lack of strategic planning, given that Moree SF now sits under 0.8 (so it is losing 20% of its revenue) and likely would not be happy with the system operator.

Forty-five projects have seen 2pp losses in the last two years, 24 of which are in NSW. With 14 out of 27 on the positive side, most of which are recovering from the dreaded X5 line constraints previously bringing them down, and two projects must install syncons on-site or nearby. The others being a part of the Molong 94T (or rather the ‘Line of Losses’ marginal bid price constraint that has also seen heavy focus by Transgrid. This year’s big winners of the MLF change were all those connecting into Darlington Point substation, thanks to some line protection works and capacitor reconfiguration.

Across a two-year gap, outside of the X5 line, no projects have seen noticeable continuous improvement as more VRE enters the system. And it’s turned into more of a sawtooth motion. Put simply, enough load is not in close proximity to VRE at the moment. The future addition of batteries has the potential to alleviate this. In particular, a potential Congestion Relief Market (CRM) will likely provide some further revenue for those building in remote locations.

As more renewable generators enter the market, grid challenges such as increased curtailment and decreased MLFs are risks that will continue to be part of NEM for the foreseeable future. The key to the MLF is both location and accessible future load, and those who can install their load (such as through syncons and batteries) prove to be continuous winners. Future work on the CRM may do wonders on how best to incentivise investment to address imbalances in constraints and areas with weak MLFs – something to consider when choosing a location.

Our in-house Power System Analysis and Market Modelling provide MLF forecasting based on sound engineering techniques and assumptions derived from our vast experience, comprehensive research, and independent view of relevant areas. For more information on Power System Analysis or other modelling products, please contact

To keep reading, please log in to your account or sign up for free

Alternatively, please sign up to receive free market insight online and direct to your inbox

Related thinking

Commercial and market outlook

VNI West selected path; an incentive for delaying coal retirements?

On 29 May 2023, AEMO published a conclusions report on the VNI West Project. According to the report, option 5A (a variant of  AEMO’s preferred option in a previous consultation paper) is preferred for VNI West. In option 5A, the transmission line crosses the Murray River north of Kerang (Wamba...

Commercial and market outlook

Spot the spread: Are current battery revenues enough to encourage further investment?

In AEMO’s ‘Step Change’ scenario, it was estimated that storage capacity in the NEM would need to increase by a factor of 30 between 2022 and 2050 to support a grid transformation that limits temperature rises below 2 degrees. This represents about 13GW of new storage capacity by 2030 and...

Power and gas networks

Trouble Ahead? – What’s Next For TNUoS Charges?

Some industry participants will be well versed in the Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) charging regime, while others may not have had to engage with it before. Regardless of previous involvement, these charges are becoming increasingly important to understand for reasons we will discuss shortly.  In this week’s ‘Chart...

Commercial and market outlook

Feast or famine? FCAS costs in South Australia

Frequency Control Ancillary Service (FCAS) prices are highly volatile, at times resulting in short periods of extremely high FCAS cost. Three such events in recent history are the South Australian (SA) islanding events in November 2019, February 2020, and November 2022. During these events, FCAS costs in SA totalled $16...

Low carbon generation

NSW’s transition to a new era: What will replace Eraring?

After 52 years of operation, the NSW Liddell power station officially shut down last 28 April. With Liddell’s closure, NSW’s transition to a green energy future is in full swing. First announced in 2015, NSW had seven years to ensure there is enough replacement capacity once Liddell is retired. Since...

Commercial and market outlook

It’s the Liddell things that matter

Australia’s oldest coal-fired power plant Liddell retired completely in the last week of April 2023 after 52 years. This giant of AGL, which had a total registered capacity of 2,000 MW, operationally acted as a 1600MW station and 1200MW after the closure of its third unit. Australia’s transition to clean...

Energy storage and flexibility

A look at AEMO pre-dispatch forecasts over the last year

The Energy Security Board (ESB), under the direction of the National Cabinet, is currently working on a number of changes that will impact how generators connect to and operate within the National Electricity Market (NEM). The Congestion Relief Market (CRM) model is one such change to how the NEM currently...

Commercial and market outlook

Iceman Liddell calls it a career

Recently in the news, there has been some concern that the closure of the Liddell power station in NSW will be a repeat of what we witnessed in 2017 with the closure of Hazelwood. Hazelwood’s closure led to higher prices, particularly over summer peak demand periods1. This is a poor...