RESS 2 – Five key insights

Higher costs drive up auction clearing price

It’s been a tumultuous couple of years since RESS 1. As the world recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic and the conflict in Ukraine continues, stresses and strains are being felt across many sectors of the economy, and infrastructure is no exception.

Pent up demand for construction projects put on hold during COVID is driving prices up, along with supply chain issues and staff shortages caused by the pandemic. Inflation is on the rise and the Russian invasion and subsequent sanctions have sent oil, gas and electricity prices shooting up. This perfect storm has resulted in a jump in labour, energy and material costs, which in turn has led investors to raise their RESS auction bid prices in order to cover their higher build costs.

Investors cautious in the face of extreme volatility

When investors decide on the price they will enter into the auction they are forecasting what their costs and revenues will be over the lifetime of their asset – typically around 25 years. If successful, the subsidy price they receive will be fixed whilst their costs and revenues could change significantly. As a result, investors are likely to be prudent and build in a premium to cover themselves against possible fluctuations over that time. The pandemic and Russian invasion have contributed to huge volatility in global markets and will likely cause cautious investors to revisit the risk premiums they use.

RESS contracts leave a number of risks in the hands of the investor and as such the investor will include risk premiums in their bid prices to protect themselves. Constraints, curtailment, inflation and planning and grid delivery risks are of particular concern to investors. Amending the terms and conditions to mitigate some of these risks would lead to reduced costs to consumers. Cornwall Insight and Wind Energy Ireland produced an in-depth report on this, which you can read here.

Solar shines in the auction…

RESS 2 proved to be an appealing proposition for solar developers, attracting over twice as much capacity to enter compared to the previous RESS 1 auction. The auction itself was a triumph for solar projects, taking 54% of the successful volume – a notable increase from 34% in RESS 1.

A possible driver for this will be the introduction of a beneficial Evaluation Correction Factor for solar. This is a parameter designed to weight different technologies based on the relative benefits they bring to the system and for RESS 2 was utilised to incentivise solar technology.

Across RESS 1 and 2 the total solar capacity procured reaches over 2.3GW. Compare that to the target set out for 2030 in the Climate Action Plan 2021, where the aim was 1.5 – 2.5 GW of solar, and the goal is now comfortably met. Will this limit be increased in subsequent Climate Action Plan updates, or will onshore wind be given preferential treatment in RESS 3 and beyond? We will need to wait and see.

…Whilst onshore wind chills

Interest from the onshore wind sector cooled with an 11% drop in capacity entering the RESS 2 auction. However, the majority of participants entering were rewarded, with 93% of onshore wind projects winning a contract. Perhaps investors are considering other routes to market, either by attempting to recoup their money back sooner through very high wholesale market prices in the near term or through an index-linked corporate power purchase agreement which offers an element of protection not available in RESS 2.

A precursor for upcoming auctions

Whilst RESS 2 covered solar and onshore wind projects only, some of the trends seen in the auction results are likely to be reflected elsewhere in the energy sector. ORESS 1, the first RESS auction specifically allocated to offshore wind farms, is due to take place later in 2022, along with the structurally similar CfD Auction Round 4 in Great Britain. Whilst these auctions may have slightly different terms and look at different technologies the drivers will likely be the same – increased costs will push up the auction clearing prices.

For support or modelling for the RESS and CfD auctions, please get in touch with Cathal Ryan at c.ryan@cornwall-insight.ie


Related thinking

Low carbon generation

RESS 3 consultation: DECC is listening, but the true test will be in the detail of the solutions incorporated 

The Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications (DECC) published the consultation for the third round of the Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS 3) on 28 October 2022. Some of the issues drawn out in the consultation is a testimony that DECC has its ears on the ground and is...

Energy Market Design

Financing Net Zero: A (revenue) cap on UK merchant financing opportunities?

On 13 October 2022, we hosted the latest instalment of our ‘Financing Net Zero’ webinar series. The session, sponsored by Shoosmiths, focused on opportunities and challenges for merchant financed renewable projects amid the current wholesale price volatility.   In recent years, due to the increasing success-rate and profitability of renewable projects,...

Regulation and policy

Government to consult on the introduction of Cost-Plus-Revenue Limit

The government issued its Energy Prices Bill on 12 October. The bill will put in law a number of the already-announced mechanisms that will be used to support households and businesses this winter including the Energy Price Guarantee and the Energy Bill Relief Scheme. Also announced alongside this is the...

Energy Market Design

How does REMA impact energy generation, flexibility and consumers?

The Review of Electricity Market Arrangements (REMA) is the largest review programme of GB electricity market arrangements for a generation. It comes at a time when European energy markets are suffering extreme turmoil. Depending on the outcome there could be significant implications for generators, flexibility providers, and, indirectly, consumers. REMA...

Energy Market Design

REMA: electricity market design choices

Electricity markets will serve as the foundation for the future GB energy system.  This article examines some of the market design decisions that will be considered by the Review of Electricity Market Arrangements (REMA). Market design goals At its most simple, a well-functioning market will attract enough potential “buyers” and...

Low carbon generation

Head to Head: CfD vs RESS

2022 has been busy for renewable developers in Great Britain and Ireland, with both the fourth allocation round of the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme and the second round of the Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS) concluding this summer. We compared the latest results of the CfD and RESS schemes...

Low carbon generation

Energy System Reform: Ofgem shares plans for Britain’s energy system

Against the backdrop of record high and volatile energy prices, Ofgem set out on 8 July its view on key aspects of the GB energy system where it considers significant reform is required to deliver a resilient, low cost, low carbon energy sector. Recent developments in the energy market, such...

Energy Market Design

Can we fix the wholesale energy market this winter to lower prices and should we want to? 

The Review of Electricity Market Arrangements (REMA) is intended to discuss and decide on appropriate market arrangements for 2035 in a Net Zero, low marginal cost, renewables-dominated market. It is unlikely it has the scope or capability to intervene in the market arrangements ahead of this winter. Therefore, some new interventions...