Up north and down south – trends for generator TNUoS charging

The topic of generator Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) is becoming a subject of increasing interest for stakeholders as regulation, policy, and the generation mix create potential volatility for future charging trends. The significant costs posed through TNUoS are an important consideration for generators, with high variability between regions and charging years having large implications for the feasibility of new build sites and the ongoing costs for existing assets.

Most recently, TNUoS charges have attracted concerns from developers in Scotland, particularly Northern Scotland, over high and rising TNUoS costs which now pose a potential barrier to the development of new onshore wind and remote island projects. To explore this topic further, in this blog we have undertaken an analysis of the long-term trends in TNUoS charges, using Northern Scotland and Central London as two examples at different ends of the charging spectrum. We demonstrate how costs have developed over time and outline some of the key drivers behind these changes, as well as the potential for future changes.

Using historical tariff data from National Grid ESO for 2005-06 to 2019-20, confirmed final tariffs for 2020-21 and 2021-22 and the latest five-year forecast out to 2025-26 we have created a timeline of TNUoS charges. Data for Northern Scotland and Central London are outlined in Figure 1, assuming costs for a typical renewable generator, with key developments also plotted along the timeline. These regions have been used to showcase  the large differences in locational charges between them as well as for consistency with both regions being maintained as TNUoS charging zones throughout the assessment period.

Across the 20 years, some interesting trends can be seen, showing how regulation, policy, the growth of renewables and the changing generation mix have impacted charges. Firstly, it is worth asking the “why?” of the differences in generator costs. Charging methodologies for TNUoS utilise location based signals, and for generation this has typically meant that generators in regions where power is assumed to be flowing further to reach customers will face higher charges than those deemed closer to demand. Power flows have typically been north to south, with historic economic factors typically seeing higher demand bases in the Midlands, London and South East and greater levels of power generation in the North, typically linked to historic coal field use or North Sea gas access. The trend for more northern located generators has been magnified in recent years by the growth in onshore wind in Scotland.

Therefore, zones further north have typically faced higher generator TNUoS charges, with those farthest south often seeing very low costs or even TNUoS credits. This methodology is clearly seen in our chart with the two zone differences, but it is also worth noting how tariffs in Northern Scotland have shown much greater variability than southern regions over the years.  

On the chart, we also highlight how changes coincide with key regulatory and charging developments over the last decade. These include:

  • RIIO-1: An increase of 15.8% and 66.7% can be observed across Northern Scotland and Central London respectively around the same time as implementation of the RIIO-1 price controls in 2013-14. Following this increase, tariffs in Central London show a general trend of decline out to 2020-21 whereas Northern Scotland sees significant variability over the same period.
  • Project Transmit: Came into place in 2016-17 and established a separate, lower TNUoS tariff for intermittent technologies. Regions supporting high proportions of intermitted renewable technologies, such as Northern Scotland, saw a significant impact from this development with charges across many regions dropping substantially following its implementation. In 2016-17 charges in Northern Scotland dropped by 55.3%, to £11.43/kW. Meanwhile there appears to be little to no impact to charges in Central London where renewable integration is considerably lower.
  • Power flows and the Western HVDC link: Tariffs in Northern Scotland increased in the two years following the implementation of Project Transmit, rising to £24.02/kW in 2018-19 and regaining much of the loss observed in 2016-17. During this period, the Western HVDC Link came into operation and facilitated increased power flows from north to south. The net effect being greater power flows from north to south and an increased locational charging signal, with resulting higher costs for those north of this. The proposed Eastern link, whilst facilitating further flows of power, would also have a similar net effect on TNUoS charges in Northern Scotland.
  • Targeted Charging Review (TCR): Most recently the TCR has impacted charges, with TNUoS tariffs from 2021-22 set to rise by 42.3% and 58.1% for Northern Scotland and Central London respectively. This rise relates to the implementation of the TCR decision to remove the residual component of TNUoS charges. This residual was a negative figure and once removed for all regions alongside a general increase to tariffs results in a ~£5.00/kW increase across GB for 2021-22.  

Looking forwards, based on National Grid’s five-year view of charges, tariffs in Northern Scotland are then expected to gradually increase out to 2025-26. This increase in an already expensive region for electricity generation is of significant concern for developers. We have calculated that annual TNUoS costs for a typical 40MW onshore wind site in Northern Scotland are expected to rise from £0.46mn in 2016-17 to £1.28mn by 2025-26, representing an increase of roughly 180% across the nine years.

Both the volatility in TNUoS and the overall £/kW level are now being seen by some developers as a potential barrier for further deployment of renewables assets on the pathway to Net Zero. Whilst locational signals are important in incentivising generators to locate closer to demand, potentially saving network reinforcement and development costs as well as reducing losses, many generators face little optionality on development locations. Put more frankly, large onshore wind developments are only viable in a few specific locations across the country, notably Northern Scotland, and incentives to locate further south to benefit from lower network charging are unlikely to align with other requirements such as wind speeds, land costs and likelihood of planning approval.    

Other parties are also publishing their positions on this topic, with SSEN Transmission releasing a discussion paper on transmission charges on 15 February, calling for views on the current TNUoS charging regime. The paper outlines SSEN Transmission’s findings on TNUoS charging in Northern Scotland and explores the issue of TNUoS volatility and unpredictability. SSEN argues that this variability is largely a result the number of inputs to the methodology that can change each year and suggests that the supporting data and sensitivities used to develop National Grid’s five-year view is “wildly erroneous”. SSEN Transmission is consequently calling for the TNUoS charging regime to be reviewed.

Whilst the current National Grid five-year forecast does provide a view on potential future charges, SSEN’s point on volatility may persist with a number of regulatory changes currently paused or awaiting decision and not currently factored into these five-year views. These include potentially changing the expansion constant calculation (CMP 315) which could stretch and enhance locational signals, and reforms to the current 27 charging zones.

Whilst the outcome of these reforms is uncertain, it is clear that TNUoS charges and associated regulatory interactions now form a material part of the business case assessment for new build assets, especially those in Scotland.

Our independent 15-year TNUoS forecast provides generators with a clear long-term view of potential cost trajectory beyond the typical lens of five-year assessments. We also provide bespoke long-term assessments on the impacts of regulatory change for TNUoS on a site specific and portfolio basis. For more details on our services please contact James Brabben on j.brabben@cornwall-insight.com

Related thinking

Net zero corporates and ESG

The stakes are higher than they seem: the current energy challenge and net zero

It has been an incredibly challenging week in the UK energy sector, and attention has rightly focussed on consumer protection, and indirectly on the state of the energy supply markets. However, it would be a mistake to believe that the ramifications of supplier failure will be limited only to this...

Commercial and market outlook

How can research help: what is the gap in understanding that should be addressed most urgently?

In the last two decades, the debate around addressing climate change has rightly focused on identifying – and supporting – the most suitable technologies to decarbonise our economies. Consequently, significant progress has been achieved in the decarbonisation of the power sector. However, as the priority is now to decarbonise hard-to-abate...

Home supply and services

Consolidation in the energy market predicted to continue

It has been a turbulent time for the retail energy market, experiencing a period of consolidation with mergers and supplier exits. This supplier consolidation is expected to continue in the near term. If suppliers fail to shift their business models for the new world it is likely to continue, according...

Low carbon generation

BEIS Hydrogen Strategy

The flagship Hydrogen Strategy paper was unveiled by BEIS on 18 August and confirmed that hydrogen will form a crucial part of the UK’s net zero economy. Perhaps disappointingly, the paper only reaffirms the 5GW of production capacity by 2030 commitment as set out in the Ten Point Plan with...

Net zero corporates and ESG

Data critical for sustainable investments

On 24 June, attendees to our 'Financing net zero forum' tuned in to hear the expert panel discussions on the role of data in sustainable investment. Joining the meeting chairs, Cornwall Insight's Daniel Atzori and Emma Bill were our guest panellists from Mercatus and Victory Hill Capital Group LLP. For investors to make...

Low carbon generation

Our Renewables Pipeline Tracker: In with the new – scoping projects and progression through planning stages

Our latest Renewables Pipeline Tracker was published on 11 June, and this blog provides a summary of some of the recent developments in our coverage of the pipeline for new build and repowering renewables assets in GB. What’s new? Seabed leasing rounds, scoping projects and CfD announcements Since our previous...

Heat networks

Reallocating electricity policy costs to incentivise low carbon heating technologies

Funding the cost of decarbonising the power system has mainly been through the consumers' electricity bills. In fact, in 2020-21 these costs amounted to a whopping £10bn. But is this method of raising revenue for decarbonisation still fit for purpose when faced with the need to decarbonise the nation's heat?...

Net zero corporates and ESG

Financing net zero panel advises policymakers for a long-term view of net zero to boost merchant renewable confidence

Last Thursday's 'Financing net zero forum' brought together 580 registered attendees across the renewables sector to listen to the expert panel discuss managing renewable merchant risk. Joining the chair of the meeting were experts from across the industry, with Shoosmiths sponsoring the afternoon discussions. Merchant renewables – the development of...